Equipment and Where The Money Comes From

Nope, they didn't fall from the skies.

I wished, I really did.


The answer to whether photography is an expensive hobby is both yes and no. It's relative depending on what type of photographs you are taking and what you use. But for starters, you don't need to own a studio or Hasselblad H4D to learn.

New people discover my work everyday, and I'm not oblivious to the comments of those who think I was born rich with all my wants served on a silver platter. And also for the sake of everyone else who's struggling and wondering, I figure it really doesn't hurt to recap a bit and explain.


I bought my first camera when I was 18, it was a Canon 350D, priced at roughly US$1000 with the kit lens. I paid for it myself. 

From 15 to 19 I represented Singapore in air rifle. I had participated and won a decent share at my age then, the award and prize monies I received every year had always gone into my savings, save for the artbooks that I firmly believed were fundamental to my artistic development.

I worked my keep and took no allowances. I trained five to six days a week after school all those years, on top of weiqi, micromouse and piano, it wasn't easy.

The childhood memories of our poverty and my sufferings are enough to last me a lifetime no matter how things may have changed now. I don't think I'd regretted anything other than my existence, of being born into this world, that burdened my mother, my family. If I can earn for myself, I'll do it, and never be a weight again.

(Now that I think about it, that means I'd been working for almost eight years now. It's really been a while. Time really passes by so fast...)


These days a second hand entry-level DSLR goes for less than US$500. Trust me when I say you don't need the newest on the market.

However, with the popularity of photography, I'd say most parents would get you a new one if you're well-behaved enough anyway. :) If they don't, a couple days of part-timing through summer break should more than settle it, just don't splurge on makeup, dining, toy models and partying. It's seriously not that hard.

I know it's easy to be bitter about what someone else has, but maybe take a moment to chill and think about it, about how you can work to get things for yourself just as well if there isn't someone to get them for you. I'm sure you'll treasure what you spend your money on even more, with a pretty good sense of satisfaction too. :)

Here're some shots taken using the 350D + kit lens with natural/available light:

No, not Twilight, thank you very much.

The moment after...

The Days of Our Lives

Headphones are Stylish.

Back to the 350D kit...

I had my doubts in the beginning—whether an expensive lens would make my photos better, whether getting lights will help, whether working with a bigger space will make it more awesome. Sure, they definitely make a difference, but as a beginner with barely trained eyes, there was a lot to be learnt with just the kit lens. All there is to do is to experiment and photograph a lot. (18-55mm is really a pretty good range, truthfully speaking.)

Something else that was interesting to explore was light. I got a second hand 1kw Arri hotlight from a friend for US$500, and rented Bowens and Profotos when I had jobs. One light really goes a long way.

Some shots done against a wall in our living room with one light. I always had to clear our sofa away, but it makes just enough room for all of these:

Redemption

This Side Up.

Newspapers are Good for You

M.

A real cheap studio kit from your to-go camera store costs lesser than US$300 the last time I checked (two months ago).

If you're not trying for 'studio' looks, a 50mm F/1.4 could be a good investment too, it costs around US$350. There's a beautiful depth of field when the aperture is opened wide, giving beautiful bokehs (blurs) in the background. (No examples with the 350D here, I didn't get a prime lens till much later)


The actual shooting stuff aside—wardrobe was pretty much just things from my closet. Also helped by the fact that I was doing fashion design, so I had a lot of incomplete pieces from sewing classes that were perfect for layering and shooting. Then again, basic stuff go a long way. In the first year I'd say it's more about learning the framing, lights and shadows than anything else.

Post-processing wise, there's usually a photo-processing software that comes with the camera you purchase. If you want to move on to Photoshop, Lightroom, Aperture, Capture One, or other programs, you are definitely encouraged to experiment. But to begin with, your kit one is probably more than good enough.

I like to use Lightroom for cataloguing because it's really easy and you can use it for processing as well. The student edition is only US$89.


So there you go, US$900's pretty much all you need for a start with enough to last a while. It's not free, but nothing so astronomical that you can't work and save for if you want it bad enough and try hard enough.

I hope this entry helps and clears up some of the mysteries. And you may go ahead and judge my lousy PS skills, haha. XD But wow, 18 feels like a lifetime ago now. Damn I feel old... x_x

I'll do a part two if anyone's interested to see the rest of my equipment upgrade journey? Now back to packing~~

Related read for this entry: My Education